![]() You may give it credit for heightening something from the original, but it doesn't do that well either. Then again, the effects aren't bad, but that's not the point. And you better off watching an actual stunt show, which at least doesn't make you get through to its drab expositions and the fact that it's more real and not embellished by any special effects. It's not a good undercover cop thriller, nor a good bromantic film. There are ideas that could have been utilized more, but it's too burdened by both action movie clichés and the fact that it is being Point Break. And Point Break (2015) is just another needless remake. And the movie wouldn't be any different if Teresa Palmer's role was written off. ![]() Ray Winstone, though a good actor, is just not the memorably delightful Papas that Gary Busey established. Edgar Ramirez is probably just stuck with a blandly written Bodhi and really stays stick-in-the-mud with whatever he says about nature. ![]() Luke Bracey isn't quite bad as an action hero, but he seriously needs a better material than this. The action is kind of stunning the fact that they're visually more realistic to look at than most CG-fest that blockbusters tend to feed us (except for the epilogue which is too obvious.) Maybe the best among them is the rock climbing sequence where it goes from wide shots to dirty hand shots of seeing how much they'd grip. it's not Point Break without it, I guess? However, there are some things to at least like in this film. And the epilogue is horrendously shoehorned, like it's nothing more than a tip off the hat, because. Also the iconic scene involving Utah shooting up the air, which apparently Hot Fuzz did it better. They did the Ex- Presidents, even though one of them is wearing an Obama mask despite of taking place in 2015, but they only did it once, probably because there isn't much room for this fan service. What's really worth groaning is when it's really trying to replicate the original not by heart or personality, but by scene. Their intention of becoming Robin Hoods is kind of vague as well, but I guess no one thinks it actually matters. They're mostly spewing exposition, while Bodhi is basically acting like a parody of someone from a New Age religion. Utah and Bodhi aren't as engaging, either. Remember when Utah had to lie about his backstory to earn her trust? Well, now they just easily hook up and nothing else, until some twist happens or something like that. Now, it somehow becomes uninteresting filler, especially the love interest. Even if it's trifle, it's still worth spending your time. One of the charms of the original, while it had some great action sequences, even the characters are interesting to watch. So whenever we see the cops, and even the daredevils, interact, it's just not so entertaining. So Point Break is now about the stunts, but just like most action movies today, it also had to strip away personality. ![]() The characters are bland, the plot makes no sense and every moment it tries to replicate with the original is just painfully forced for the sake of what they believe it's called "fan service." Therefore, there isn't much reason for Point Break (2015) to exist. Though the stunts are impressive at times, it still pales in comparison with the original. ![]() Its new approach, instead of a simple undercover cop thriller, is now a globe-trotting adventure featuring daredevils who are pulling off a grand stunt show. Either way, this remake doesn't bring enough justice to the cult classic. The original Point Break was mostly known for its memorable bromance between Utah and Bodhi and some of its greatest action scenes ever put to film. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |